The Board Communication Problem That Kills Enrollment Before It Starts

Most conversations about charter school enrollment focus on marketing—social media, open houses, yard signs, email campaigns. These matter. But there’s a category of enrollment problems that no amount of marketing can fix, because the damage happens at the governance level before a family ever sees your Instagram.

I call it the board communication problem. And it kills more enrollment potential than most founders realize.

“Families don’t just choose schools. They choose organizations. If your organization looks unstable, unclear, or uncommitted—families choose somewhere else.”

What the Board Communication Problem Looks Like

It usually shows up in one of four ways:

• Inconsistent messaging between the founder and the board. The founder says the school will open in August. A board member tells a community contact it might be September. A family hears both versions. Doubt is planted. They put the school on a backup list.
• Public board meeting dysfunction. In Georgia, board meetings are public. If your board meetings are contentious, disorganized, or reveal significant internal disagreement about direction—families who attend (and some do) take that home with them.
• Gaps between what’s promised publicly and what governance documents actually say. A founder promises a specific academic model publicly. The charter application has different language. A family who reads both—or a journalist who does—flags the discrepancy. The school’s credibility takes a hit.
• Board members who aren’t aligned on the school’s story. Board members talk to people in the community. If your board members can’t tell the school’s story—or worse, tell it differently from each other—every conversation they have in the community is eroding trust rather than building it.

Why This Matters More for Charter Schools Than Traditional Schools

Traditional public schools have built-in credibility from the system they’re part of. Families may not love the district, but they know what they’re getting. A charter school is asking families to take a bet on something new—on an institution that doesn’t have years of track record to point to.

This means the governance signals you send—intentionally or not—carry enormous weight. A family evaluating a charter school is watching for signs that the organization behind it is stable, aligned, and competent. Your board communication is part of that signal.

The Fix: Governance Alignment Before Outreach Begins

Before you launch any enrollment campaign, your governance layer needs to be aligned on three things:

1. The School’s Story

Every board member should be able to answer, in one or two sentences: what is this school, who is it for, and why does it exist? If different board members give different answers, your messaging infrastructure is already compromised. Run a board alignment session. Get agreement on the core narrative. Write it down. Share it.

2. What’s Public and What’s Internal

Board members need to understand what’s appropriate to share publicly and what stays in the governance room. Not because you’re hiding things—but because premature information about hiring decisions, lease negotiations, or curriculum changes creates confusion in the community and makes the school look unstable.

3. The Enrollment Goals and Timeline

Every board member should know: what is our enrollment target, when is our application window, and what are we asking community members to do right now? Board members who are aligned on this become passive enrollment ambassadors. Board members who don’t know the answer to these questions become a source of conflicting information.

---

Governance alignment is not glamorous work. It doesn’t show up in enrollment dashboards or social media metrics. But it creates the foundation that everything else is built on. Schools that get this right before they launch their enrollment campaigns consistently outperform schools that try to outmarket their way past internal misalignment.